Venâncio Mondlane’s camp, the former Mozambican opposition independent presidential candidate, announced on Tuesday that it is splitting with PODEMOS (Optimistic Party for the Development of Mozambique), the party which backed his independent candidature.
A letter signed by Dinis Tivane, adviser to Mozambican opposition leader Mondlane, was released today, sharply criticizing PODEMOS for its decision to accept parliamentary seats despite disputing the election results. The letter, issued from “the office of the president of the people,” accused PODEMOS of failing to stand with the Mozambican people in their fight to “save the country.”
The document also referenced unverified “rumors” that PODEMOS leaders had been bribed with cash and vehicles to abandon their resistance. These allegations, though unsubstantiated, add fuel to the growing political tensions in the wake of the contested October 2024 general elections.
The letter follows a recent fiery interview with Mondlane on private broadcaster TV Miramar, where he branded Albino Forquilha, PODEMOS’ president, a “traitor.” Mondlane, who maintains that he is the legitimate winner of the presidential race, hinted at the possibility of forming a new political party, signaling a potential fracture within the opposition.
Comment
The developments underscore the shifting of Mozambique’s political tectonic plates, as it might further complicate the so-called post-election violence political dialogue.
Mondlane and Forquilha had sometimes been at odds concerning the decision PODEMOS should take in the face of whether to take their seats in parliament or not – with all the financial windfall coming with being members of parliament, and with Forquilha enjoying all the state perks for being the leader of the most voted second party.
When PODEMOS members of parliament took their seats in the national assembly, it broadcast that it was Mondlane’s party, which could be interpreted as representing the latter’s interest. However, Mondlane has been completely sidelined from the so-called dialogue and by publicly partying ways with PODEMOS, he has put paid to any notion that talking to PODEMOS means talking to him.
This is also likely to complicate the ruling Frelimo party’s calculation to not involve Mondlane directly in the post-election violence dialogue but instead talk to PODEMOS – Frelimo has proven to be quite calculated in manipulating the political landscape to its benefit, including co-opting the opposition parties to achieve its goals while maintaining its influence and longevity.
However, Frelimo has not managed to co-opt Mondlane, who seems uninterested in material things, seemingly seeking power rather than the riches the ruling party affords those who bend their knees and kiss the ring. His refusal to submit to Frelimo could signal a strong stance of defiance, reinforcing his position as a principled opposition leader. It could bolster his credibility among his supporters and those disillusioned with the ruling party, framing him as a leader unwilling to compromise on democratic values or electoral integrity.
Even if against its interests, Frelimo should do well to invite Mondlane to talks, because failure to do so raises questions about the inclusivity and legitimacy of any post-election reconciliation process.
@2025, Mozambique Insights. All Rights Reserved
